performance beyond competence    

 

competence

 

Competence methods must meet two tests: validity (i.e. how directly they relate to job requirements), and reliability (i.e. how consistent are the assessment results).

Click for more information on competence concepts

Conventional approaches based on CVs, qualifications and experience fail on both counts - yet many employers still rely on such evidence!
The 'NVQ' approach offers high reliability, but validity is a problem - especially for experienced, specialist, or professional personnel.
Systems based on personality traits and 'core competencies' are notoriously unreliable in assessment.
There is an alternative.  Competence management systems can be valid for the business and reliable in delivery, with 'slimline' competency standards aligned to key business processes.

Rowanhill were pioneers in the field of systematic, risk-based approaches to competence management, with over 20 years' practical and theoretical experience.

On these pages we share some of our thoughts.  Follow the links in the box headed "More on competence"   --->

More about us
our approach
  maintaining balance

competence
  concepts and ideas

projects
  our track record

clients
  who we work for

competence toolkits
  RoleTrak (risk mapping)
  CompeTrak CMS database

More on competence:
competence and risk
  risk-based systems

defining the concepts
  what is competence?

jargon explained
 practical definitions

benefits of competence
  results of a recent study

new look at competence
 is it just a black hole?

beyond competence
 integrated approaches

 

© Copyright Rowanhill Consultants Ltd 1992-2008, All rights reserved.      Page last updated 07 March 2008.